Main Information of interest, their properties & relations
1) Research questions
For the whole project
Research Question | What information from the tables below is needed to answer it? | Comments | Examples |
---|---|---|---|
R 1 What is the information available for the study of urbanism in Roman and Byzantine Egypt? | Tables “Places and structures”, “Artefacts” and “Texts.” | This is what scholars of the technical disciplines known as archaeology, epigraphy, papyrology, numismatics, manuscript studies will be interested in. How does my papyrus “speak” to other kind of information? |
|
R 2-1 What made a city of Roman and Byzantine Egypt a city? Was it civic organization? Or economic dominance over the countryside? Or religious and cultural centrality? R 2-2 How did they distinguish themselves from each other? How did ancient cities express their individuality, whatever contributes to make a city unique in the eyes of its own inhabitants and external visitors (see examples)? | Tables “Places and Structures”, “Artefacts” and “Texts. | This is the “so what” question--how does Greco-Roman and late antique Egypt, which generally neglected in this respect, tell us something about urbanism in general?
| “Individual” features include:
|
R 3 How does the evidence from Egypt illustrate an “urban apogee” under the Roman Empire (i.e. high rate of urbanization and spectacular urban development relative to other “pre-modern” civilizations)? | “Persons” and “Places and Structures” | This question be of interest to historians, especially Roman and urban historians. |
|
R 4 How did urban space shape human interaction? How did human interaction shape urban space? | “Persons” and “Places and Structures” | Cf. what Fernand Braudel says of cities in the early modern Mediterranean: they were “electrifiers” | Specific types of infrastructure (material) or institutions (immaterial) and the type of activity they host:
|
Francois (Habilitation)
| Research Question | what information from the tables below is needed to answer it? | comments |
---|---|---|---|
F1 |
| Property “Provenance” in Texts Link/Relation “Chronological Phase” in Artefacts | Cf. materials of the Basel workshop on (climate) data and ancient history. |
F2 |
| All categories of buildings in “Places and Structures” | The information on urban development is so scattered and fragmented that it is impossible to reconstruct the urban landscape as a whole.
|
F3 |
| “Infrastructure” “Places of Exchange” and “Production Facilities” in Places and Structures Property “Occupation” in Persons Property “Category” (with economic relevance) in Objects | Ancient historians have long maintained that the “ancient city” was a consumer center: the information gathered and analyzed here will confirm or change this communis opinio. |
F4 |
| In general: People (all categories, including non-humans) In particular: Properties, such as Age, Physical Description, Ownership/Possessions, Status Designation/Occupation | The goal here is to move beyond the “upper middle class” known in papyri and to uncover other segments of urban society. |
F5 |
| Property “Function” in Persons Property “Status Designation” in Persons “Administrative Districts of Egypt” and “Government Buildings” in Places and Structures | The main question in this chapter is the difference between Antinoopolis as “new city” and the other cities of Roman Egypt (the “metropoleis”) as well as the impact of Diocletian’s reform on the city and its administration. |
F6 |
| Property “Religious Affiliation” in People “Sacred/religious landscape” in Places and Structures Property “Typology” in Objects | Two big “dossiers” are cult practice around the figure of Antinoos (and other gods) and the disruption of this religious system by Christianity.
|
F7 |
| People Property “Typology” of Objects (Writing Tools) Category “Literary Manuscripts” in Objects | Alexandria is often seen as the beacon of culture in classical antiquity but Antinoopolis was also a center for cultural, artistic, and scholarly production--a kind of “second Alexandria.” |
Stefania (Research Articles)
Research Question | what information (above) is needed to answer it? | comments |
---|---|---|
Distribution of archaeological evidence over the time:
| Tables “Places and structures”, “Artefacts” and “Texts” with attention to the chronological phases | Thematic plans (diachronic analysis of all data) |
Based on archaeological and textual data, what are the various phases of the city's urban development?
| “Places and structures”, “Artefacts” and “Texts” + Chronology-Phases |
|
Reconstruction (when possible) of the contexts in which the documentary material was found.
| “Artefacts” and “Texts” Tabs: Historical Archaeological Report/ Assemblages/ Contexts / Accounts of Travelers and Explorers |
|
Lucas (Doctoral Dissertation)
| Research Question | what information (below) is needed to answer it? | comments |
---|---|---|---|
L1 |
| “Monuments” in Places & Structures |
|
L2 |
| Property “Function” in People |
|
L3 |
| Property “Possessions” in People of civic officials (Property “Function” in People) |
|
L4 |
| Categories “Visitors” and “Outsiders connected to the city” in People |
|
L5 |
| Property “Name” in People/Date of their attestation(s) | Onomastic analysis performed in TM People |
L6 |
| In general: Property “Religious affiliation” in People For onomastics: Property “Name” in People For martyrs: “Christian-Religious Materials” in Texts For material culture: “Sacred/Religious Landscape” in Places & Structures | Checkbox ‘Christian’ in TM People |
Gregorio (Master’s Thesis)
Research Question | what information (above) is needed to answer it? | comments |
---|---|---|
|
Main tools/databases:
|
|
2) The following information is of key interest:
Persons
Information of interest | Properties | Relations/ links | Examples | Description & Comments | Trismegistos Data | Relevant Information for Research Question |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
People of Heracleopolis Magna and Antinoopolis crm:E21 Person
|
|
|
| People who are connected to Ant. or Her. either as citizens, inhabitants, visitors, or otherwise |
|
|
Non-humans, animals |
|
|
| “Animals in the City” is an interesting and trendy topic in current scholarship | Not in TM |
|
1) Citizens of Heracleopolis and Antinoopolis |
|
|
| “Citizens” (metropolitai) of Heracleopolis = people who say they are “from Heracleopolis” (ἀφʼ Ἡρακλέους πόλεως); Citizens of Antinoopolis = “Antinoites” (cf. e.g. Λούκιος Λογγῖνος Γέμελλος Ἀντινοεὺς [TM REF 400088/PER 305737]) | Field “Ethnic” in TM PER | F5-3 (property-”designation of origin,” i.e. citizenship status) F5-2 (property “function”) F7-3 (artists, intellectuals, philosophers from the city) L2-1 (“function”) L3-1 (“possessions”) L5-1 (“name”/”date”) L6-1 (“name”/”date”) |
2) Inhabitants
crm:E21 Person |
|
|
| The equivalent of a metic or legal alien, κατοικων in the sources
| Field “Residence” in TM PER |
|
2a) People buried in or around the city |
|
|
| People buried in or around a city can be assumed to have been inhabitants (in a broad sense) of that city; mostly attested at Antinoopolis, where archaeologists have explored the necropoleis. In most cases it is not possible to establish the context (precise location + object assemblage) but only the finding area. | Not entirely in TM (only people attested by name) |
|
3) Visitors (of Ant. or Her.) | Imported from TM People |
|
| People who are temporarily present in Ant. or Her. (to do business, to pay a visit to a friend, to participate in a festival, etc.) | Field “Visited” in TM REF |
|
4) Outsiders connected to the city (but not visitors) |
|
|
| People who are not present in the city but in touch with it, e.g. by writing a letter to the council |
|
|
Places & Structures
Information of interest | Properties | Relations/ links | Examples | Description & Comments | Relevant to Research Questions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
“Cities” in Roman and Byzantine Egypt: these are the macro-entities we want to compare ultimately.
sdh:C13 Geographical Place https://kleiolab.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/PWP/pages/3416457229
|
https://ontome.net/class/365/namespace/3
|
| Antinoopolis Heracleopolis Magna ALSO Pelusium, Oxyrhynchus, Hermoupolis Magna, Memphis Map of Roman Egypt showing those sites
| Here we mean the “cities” we are studying in the project as well as other cities from Roman and Byzantine Egypt that could be used as comparanda.
[ |
|
Non-Urban Settlements:
sdh:C13 Geographical Place |
|
| Villages of the Herakleopolite Villages of the Antinoite, e.g. village of Pesla Anô ( ) Other Egyptian villages, e.g. Karanis where M. Anthestius Gemellus, a citizen of Antinoopolis, was based according to P. Mich. 12 629 ( ): “To Lucceius Ofellianus, his excellency the epistrategos, from Marcus Anthestius Gemellus, of the Nervian tribe and the Propatorian deme, belonging to those who are designated as being outside the dole. Having come here, my lord, for the harvest of the crops, in order to settle the public account, but up to now having not yet accomplished anything, I ask, if it seems good to you, to allow me, after . . . to remain abroad for another thirty days as well, in order that I may be benefited. Farewell. [- - -]”
|
| L3-1 (landownership in the nome) |
Administrative Districts of Egypt
sdh:C13 Geographical Place |
|
| Herakleopolite nome, Antinoite nome, province of the Thebaid; nomes are listed and coded by Trismegistos as follows: | This is important to understand the effect of administrative reforms on cities.
| F5-4 |
Urban Neighborhoods
sdh:C13 Geographical Place |
|
| Numbered Neighborhoods in Antinoopolis, e.g. in the Gamma neighborhood (=3) Sapsis, a freedwoman, rented a house and workshops from Dideis, according to P. Worp 20 Amphoda in Heracleopolis Magna
| Archaeologically, one can only attempt to understand what they were or in what part of the city. They are not recognizable from the field. |
|
Monuments
|
|
| The tetrastylon The Column of Alexander Severus:
|
|
|
Government building
|
|
| Headquarters buildings, e.g. a Praetorium is attested in a Strasbourg papyrus (SB 18 13174) and archaeologically according to Peter Grossmann:
| Buildings for which their 'governmental' function can be defined with certainty |
|
Sacred/Religious Landscape
sdh:C13 Geographical Place |
|
| Churches, Monasteries, Temples, Chapels | Places/areas of worship |
|
Funerary Landscape sdh:C13 Geographical Place (if intended as site) or sdh:C17 Construction (if just one tomb) |
|
| Necropolis, Tombs, Chapels/Mausolea
| Set of tombs (necropolis) or individual graves + associated structures (chapels/mausolea) |
|
Domestic buildings
|
|
| Houses | Attestations both in the archaeological record and in texts (wills, sale contracts, census returns)
Archaeologically, in neither settlement have the residential structures been fully documented (we do not have the entire floor plan) |
|
Production Facilities
sdh:C13 Geographical Place |
|
| Storages Kilns for the production of pottery Atelier for the production of terracotta figurines Area of scoriae |
|
|
Places of Exchange
sdh:C13 Geographical Place |
|
| The harbor is mostly attested in papyri, e.g. in P. Oxy. 43 3111 ( ) The agora (=marketplace) is attested in Byzantine times only. |
|
|
Road Network and Transportation Infrastructure
sdh:C13 Geographical Place |
|
| Streets Bridges Via Hadriana Other |
|
|
Natural Resources
sdh:C13 Geographical Place |
|
| Water Resources (wells, river, wadi) Quarries
Agricultural Land |
|
|
Entertainment Facilities sdh:C13 Geographical Place (if intended as site) or sdh:C17 Construction (if just one building) |
|
| Hippodrome Gymnasium Theater
|
|
|
Baths
|
|
| Baths are mentioned in a papyrus from the Strasbourg papyrus collection (SB 18 13174) and in Jomard’s description de l’Egypte. |
|
|
Infrastructure
sdh:C13 Geographical Place |
|
| Water Supply (aqueduct): for Heracleopolis only, following Josep Padro Embankments, article by Spanu (same as on bridges)
|
|
|
Structures
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decorative elements |
|
| Capitals, decorative motifs, painted plaster, gypsum decorations, etc. Ex.: Church Eastern Gate Antinoupolis Decorative elements pillar resting on bases with Attic profile and surmounted by Corinthian capitals, opus sectile examples:
Furthermore building technique: regular square blocks and mud bricks at english bond? → see below
spolia: yes (reuse of architectural elements from previous buildings)→ see below Plan: Traditional basilica plan characterised by a large central nave, two lateral aisles, and the sanctuary with semicircular apse (internal) and lateral pastophoria.→ see below Material: yellow limestone, mudbricks, marble slabs. incl. opus mixtum. yes (stones+mudbricks)→ see below Phases → see below I phase: public monuments, maybe a propylaeum in red granite, imperial period II Phase: triumphal arch , end of 3rd (Marcus Aurelius Carus inscription) ? Phase: large peristyle preceding the entrance (only partially investigated), make reasonable to interpret this space as a reception hall possibly belonging to an episcopal palace (episcopium) (Grossmann 2012, 77-82, pls. 2a-b, 3, 4a-b, 5a). III phase: Church, first third of the V century (changing of function)
|
|
|
Building techniques |
|
| Ex.: House K in Heracleopolis spolia: yes Mansory texture: English bond
→ 9
total; 23 to be selected |
|
|
Plan Characterization / classification / description of the construction |
|
|
|
|
|
Material |
|
| material type
Ex.: House K Heracleopolis Mudbrick
Baths (Antinoupolis) mudbrick+bricks+ stone (decorative elements) |
|
|
Quantity of materials used |
|
| 2 tons of marble |
|
|
Phases (of the evolution of the building) |
|
|
| maybe not needed if
|
|
Function/usage of a structure/building |
|
| Ex.: Structure of “Church Eastern Gate Antinoupolis”
→ can have serval functions at once (eg religous and public) |
|
|
event of construction |
|
| examples: |
|
|
renovation/reparation |
|
| examples: |
|
|
Quantity of materials used |
|
| examples:
|
|
|
Artefacts
Information of interest | Properties | Relations/ links | Examples | Description & Comments | Relevant for Research Question |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Objects
| Category Typology Material Provenance (for imported objects) details of interest
|
| Written Objects Writing Tools Vessels in ceramic, glasses, faience Statues/statuettes Terracotta figurines Metal objects Architectural elements (style) Textiles Jewelry Tools Lamps Furniture Coins
| each category of objects consists of different types (archaeological nomenclature)
Ex. statuette of Isis-Renenoutet Category: Terracotta Figurines Typology: Deity Material: ceramic Provenance: Local details: shape, production features, function, modern place (museum/collection) etc.. |
|
Contexts | Brief description Category Typology Material |
| Ex. House K (Heracleopolis) “The Ironmonger house” Coins (from Trajan to Antoninus) Archeological layers (abandonment, post abandonment, destruction, life phases). In the case of House K the objects are linked to the last use of the structure followed by a phase/level of destruction and fire | When places and structures are excavated using stratigraphic methodology (modern archaeology) In archaeology, a context is all the information associated to an archaeological element including the provenience (where it is), the environment in which it was found, and association (the relationships among other artifacts/ecofacts/structures/features = assemblages). All aspects of the context are essential when analyzing archaeological materials as they provide us with additional information that complement analysis and interpretation.
|
|
Assemblages | Type of objects Material |
| Set of several objects. Ex: burial equipment from Gayet Excavation = pottery, coins, terracotta figurines, textiles, mummies, portraits etc.)
| When places and structures are excavated without contextual information |
|
Texts
Information of interest | Properties | Relations/ links | Examples | Description & Comments |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accounts of Travelers and Explorers |
|
|
| NB It would be great to integrate the relevant passages in original language and translation into the database. |
|
Papyrus Texts |
|
|
| There are many types of documentary papyri. Items collected in one series of papyri belonging to the same “type” constitute a dossier that illustrate an aspect of city life. For instance, sale contracts are relevant to economic activity; proceedings of meetings before the governor bear witness to judicial life; private family letters have a great deal to say about family structures in the city, and so on. NB Texts and translations will be accessible through LOD (www.papyri.info). |
|
Epigraphic Material |
|
|
|
|
|
Christian-Religious Materials |
|
|
| NB It would be great to integrate the relevant passages in original language and translation into the database. | F6-1 (gods worshipped) L6-2 (martyrs remembered on their feast days)
|
Christian-Historical Materials |
|
|
| NB It would be great to integrate the relevant passages in original language and translation into the database. |
|
Classical and Late Antique-Scholarship |
|
|
| NB It would be great to integrate the relevant passages in original language and translation into the database. |
|
Muslim/Arabic-Scholarship |
|
|
| NB It would be great to integrate the relevant passages in original language and translation into the database. | L 6-2 |
Poetic & Literary Compositions |
|
|
| This is a group of texts sui generis: literary texts that relate to the figure of Antinoos and more generally to the circumstances of the city’s foundation. NB It would be great to integrate the relevant passages in original language and translation into the database.
| F6-1 (gods worshipped)
|
Reliability | Numeric Value? | Comments |
Reliable | 3 | to be applied to all sources and information |
Possible | 2 | |
Uncertain | 1 | |
Not reliable | 0 |